[ad_1]
Letting Russia attempt to qualify for the World Cup while doing “irreparable and chaotic” damage to the competition, FIFA successfully argued in the sport’s Supreme Court.
The legal debate between FIFA and Russia’s football federation was published by the Court of Arbitration for Sport on Tuesday, explaining why its judge denied an urgent Russian request to stop the ban, which has allowed both men and women Kept their teams out of the World Cup.
The interim decision in Russia’s appeal on 18 March “pending a full appeal hearing to be held at the CAS in the coming weeks – ensures that the men’s team cannot play Poland in the World Cup qualifying playoffs six days later. Sweden in the playoff final.” Poland were given a bye and advanced to the tournament in Qatar.
Poland, Sweden and the Czech Republic “who lost to Sweden” stated that they would refuse to play Russia in light of the country’s war. Ukraine,
Russia has announced interest to host Euro 2028 or 2032. (file)
Russia’s three-nation boycott weighed heavily on the CAS’s immediate decision, which was in favor of FIFA’s declared need to “guarantee the smooth running of its major competition”.
Although FIFA competition rules generally penalize associations whose teams refuse to play the prescribed game, the world body of football agrees with Poland, Sweden and the Czechs.
“Those decisions are fully understood and cannot be criticized from a legal or ethical point of view,” FIFA lawyers said in a presentation to the court.
FIFA said it could anticipate that other member federations would also refuse to play Russia if the team progresses to the World Cup, saying the results of the tournament would be “irreparable and chaotic.”
“After considering all these factors, FIFA must act to guarantee the efficient organization and smooth conduct of its competitions.” the governing body said.
Lawyers for the Russian Football Federation argued that the ban was “a disguised disciplinary sanction” by the FIFA Council, where the right to a hearing was denied.
The decision was made by a single member of the CAS Management Board, Corinne Schmidhauser, Chair of the Appeals Department.
The Swiss lawyer had to decide whether the potential damage to the Russian football team outweighed the loss to FIFA as a competition organiser.
Schmidhauser said that “should the (Russia) men’s national team be allowed to play, their opponents would be denied the game and matches would not even take place.”
“The integrity of FIFA competitions will be seriously damaged,” the former Olympic skier decided.
He also cast doubt on whether the safety of players and officials could be ensured if Russia played games in a neutral country, in the light of worldwide outrage and condemnation over the incidents in Ukraine.
Schmidhauser concluded that Russia was now effectively out of the World Cup because FIFA did not offer to reinstate the team in the event of its federation winning the full appeals hearing.
However, Russia’s final World Cup status in 2022 should be a final decision for a three-judge panel that will soon hear the case on the full merits of the matter.
FIFA is one of several governing bodies of the Olympic Games now facing an appeal hearing at the CAS as Russian officials challenge the ban on its teams and athletes.
[ad_2]
Source link
